What Scopes Case Still Teaches us
🐒 Monkey Business and Memory: A Trial in Aunt Selvi’s Living Room
Aunt Selvi made the best filter coffee this side of the equator, and her living room—cluttered with crocheted antimacassars and the faint scent of mothballs—was rarely a venue for courtroom drama. But this evening, as thunder rolled low like a tired prosecutor, she found herself at the center of an unexpected tribunal.
Vayadi Sarasa, the sharp-tongued science historian with a sari that could double as an annotated timeline, was visiting. She brought with her a story. Not just any story—a fossilized fable of cultural friction, wrapped in legalese and media static. Her subject: the 1925 Scopes “Monkey” Trial, which she insisted had less to do with monkeys and more to do with the fragile vertebrae of public discourse.
Uncle Chinni, retired bureaucrat and part-time scripture whisperer, perked up at the mention of monkey. “I hope this is not another jab at Hanuman,” he muttered.
“No, no,” Sarasa replied, sipping her coffee like it was an argument she was about to win. “Though I admit, the evolutionary chain does rattle some devotional cages.”
Andy and Jenny, Selvi’s grand-niblings, had paused their phone scrolling just long enough to register: Monkey + Trial = Possibly Entertaining. They stayed.
“1925, Dayton, Tennessee,” Sarasa began, like a stage cue. “A substitute teacher named John Scopes agrees—rather sportingly—to be tried for teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution. Illegal at the time in Tennessee. But what unfolded wasn’t just a legal skirmish. It was a carnival.”
Jenny raised an eyebrow. “Like clowns and popcorn?”
“Exactly,” said Sarasa. “Except the popcorn was ideology, and the clowns were everyone.”
The Vidhūṣaka, though not physically present, hovered in the room. That mythical jester of Sanskrit theatre—equal parts fool, sage, and meme-generator—had made himself metaphorically comfortable in Aunt Selvi’s rocking chair. He snorted softly as Sarasa described the courtroom as a media circus.
“Faith versus fact. Genesis versus genetics. The trial was less about law and more about performance,” Sarasa said. “It was the first trial to be broadcast on national radio. Suddenly, epistemology had a soundtrack.”
Uncle Chinni snorted. “You make it sound like a Netflix docuseries.”
“It basically was,” Sarasa replied. “The defense called Darwin. The prosecution called God. The jury called for air-conditioning. And the public called their neighbors to listen in.”
“Who won?” asked Andy, in the tone of someone hoping it was the dinosaurs.
Sarasa smiled cryptically. “Scopes was found guilty. Fined $100. But the real winner? Confusion. Misunderstanding. And media. Especially media.”
From the corner, the ghostly Vidhūṣaka juggled metaphors and fossilized prejudices. He whispered:
“Monkey taught Darwin, or Darwin taught God?
Either way, someone’s stuck in a fraud.
If radio trials make prophets of fear,
Let the signal distort until satire is clear.”
Jenny blinked. “Was that… a poem?”
Sarasa nodded. “The Vidhūṣaka always speaks in riddles. He’s the cultural jester. Doesn’t pick sides—he just picks at the stitches.”
She spoke of Inherit the Wind, the 1955 play that reimagined the Scopes trial not as a conflict of science vs. scripture, but as freedom vs. fear. “It was written during McCarthyism,” she said. “They weren’t just chasing communists. They were hunting heretics.”
At this, Uncle Chinni leaned back, clearly sensing the irony. “So we’ve just been rerunning the same trial with different costumes?”
“Exactly,” said Sarasa. “A sort of trial-by-syndication. The stage changes, the scripts update, but the central conflict remains: What truths do we allow ourselves to believe in public, and which ones do we only whisper when no one’s listening?”
The Vidhūṣaka cleared his non-existent throat. He was holding a scroll in one hand and a Bible in the other, offering each to the opposite camp. His laugh was somewhere between divine thunder and a dying sitcom track.
“Which truth do you serve when the cameras roll?
The one that teaches you, or the one that tags you?”
Jenny quietly took a note.
The fossil scroll began to crumble at the edges. The scripture peeled itself open, revealing annotations in multiple hands. Aunt Selvi brought more coffee, as if caffeine could anchor the conversation before it drifted into epistemological space.
Uncle Chinni, halfway between offense and wonder, muttered, “So… the monkey trial never ended?”
“No,” Sarasa said, rising to go. “It just changed channels.”
And as the guests left, and the room filled again with the soft tick of ceiling fan blades, the kids stared into the dim glow of their phones—now quietly Googling “Scopes Trial,” “trilobites,” and, for reasons unclear, “banana genome.”
The Vidhūṣaka? He winked, disappeared into the static of an old radio, and laughed all the way into syndication.
Parwatisingari's Weblog 
Leave a comment