Choreography in Indian Theatre: Knowledge Systems, Aesthetics, and Embodied Intelligence
(In reflection on 9 January – International Choreographers’ Day)
Choreography, at its most evolved, is not merely the arrangement of movement but the orchestration of embodied knowledge across time, space, culture, and meaning. The term itself—derived from the Greek choros (dance) and graphein (to write)—suggests “dance-writing.” In the Indian theatrical tradition, however, choreography extends far beyond inscription; it becomes a cognitive, aesthetic, and ritual practice grounded in classical theory, lived observation, and cultural literacy.
On 9 January, International Choreographers’ Day, it is pertinent to recognize that a choreographer’s work is inseparable from a wide-ranging knowledge base. Technique alone is insufficient. A choreographer must engage with dramaturgy, geography, anthropology, ecology, ritual, architecture, and philosophy—because movement does not exist in abstraction. It is always situated.
Natyashastra and the Intelligence of Context
The Natyashastra of Bharata Muni provides a comprehensive foundation for this understanding. Across its chapters—particularly Chapters 8–14 (Rasa, Bhava, and Abhinaya), Chapter 18 (Chari and Sthanaka), and Chapter 20 (Rangavidhi)—movement is treated as meaning-bearing action. Bharata’s prescriptions are precise, yet they are not rigid formulas; they are frameworks that demand contextual interpretation.
A striking example is Bharata’s description of pathaka hastas crossed to suggest a tree. The text gives us the grammar, but not the species. Where does the choreographer place this tree? Is it the tall, flexible coconut palm of Kerala, the upright coniferous deodar of the Himalayan belt, or the wide-trunked, grounded trees of the Indo-Gangetic plains? Each demands a different bodily logic—spinal alignment, weight distribution, tempo, and spatial spread. The same gesture transforms through ecological and cultural context.
This is where choreographic intelligence moves beyond codification into interpretation.
Aesthetics Across Cultural Worlds
Equally significant is the understanding of aesthetic systems. The Natyashastra emerges from an Indic worldview, yet Indian theatre has always interacted with multiple aesthetic traditions. Abrahamic aesthetics, with their emphasis on linearity, restraint, and often iconoclastic space, differ fundamentally from the lush symbolism of the Indo-Gangetic imagination. Buddhist aesthetics introduce yet another sensibility—minimalism, inwardness, cyclical time, and meditative stillness.
These differences are not philosophical abstractions; they directly affect movement design. The stance, the gaze, the rhythm of walking, and even the point of entry onto the stage change depending on the aesthetic universe being invoked. A choreographer must be acutely aware of these distinctions to avoid homogenization.
Space, Entry, and Character Geography
The Natyashastra’s prescriptions regarding rangakramana (Chapter 20) emphasize that stage space is charged with meaning. Entry points are not neutral. Characters from Ardhamagadhi cultural zones enter and occupy space differently from Dakshinatya characters. The walk, the angle of approach, and the spatial claim reflect regional ethos, climate, and social codes.
Stock characters such as the Sutradhara or Vidhushaka are granted freedoms of movement denied to others, while kings, ascetics, and divine beings carry their own kinetic hierarchies. Status (Uchcha, Madhyama, Kanishtha), profession, and emotional state (bhava) collectively determine gait, stance, and bodily tension. Even something as subtle as shoulder placement can signal psychological condition.
Knowledge Beyond the Text: Practice as Pedagogy
A choreographer’s knowledge must also extend into everyday practices—craft, labour, and lived experience. I recall an episode during Swapna Vasavadatta, staged again nearly twenty years after the first production. There is a scene where Vasavadatta strings flowers. The actress cast in the role had never strung flowers in her life. The movement could not be imagined abstractly; it had to be taught physically—how the fingers thread, how the wrist turns, how the body settles into the repetitive intimacy of the act. Only then could the gesture acquire authenticity and rasa.
Similarly, during Ravana Hata, performed by my students at an International Sanskrit Conference, the narrative required Ravana to wander through the Himalayas, encountering wild animals. One sequence involved observing a wild boar. Explaining verbally how a boar burrows the earth with its tusks was insufficient. The dancers had to understand the animal’s weight, its grounded ferocity, the diagonal thrust of the head, and the resistance of imagined soil. Translating zoological observation into embodied movement was both a challenge and a revelation.
These moments reaffirm that choreography is an act of transmission—of knowledge from life into performance.
Ritual, Sanskrit Drama, and Embodied Memory
Sanskrit drama is inseparable from ritual. Bharata positions theatre itself as the Panchama Veda, and performative structures such as Purvaranga (Chapters 5 and 20) establish the sacred threshold of performance. Choreography in this context is not decorative but invocatory. It calls, prepares, and transforms.
This ritual dimension persists across Hindu theatrical traditions—from Kutiyattam and Yakshagana to Ramleela. In works such as Poornima, the Bharatavakya was conceived around the Divine Mother awakening nine internal energies, structured through Tillana principles. In Yuvkar (Doordarshan Panaji), the choreography welcomed the new year through Mangalacharana set to Alaripu, followed by Ahavana using temple bells—bridging time, ritual, and collective aspiration.
Conclusion
The choreographer in Indian theatre is not merely a designer of movement but a custodian of knowledge systems. On International Choreographers’ Day, it is worth acknowledging that choreography demands a wide and integrated intelligence—of texts and terrains, rituals and regions, animals and artisans, aesthetics and ethics.
Rooted in the Natyashastra yet responsive to lived realities, choreography remains a living discipline. It thrives not in uniformity but in nuance, not in replication but in informed imagination. Ultimately, choreography is the art of knowing where—and how—a body belongs in the world it seeks to represent.
For further details on my work and practice, please visit:
https://about.me/sharmilaraopn
Parwatisingari's Weblog 
Leave a comment