Fear as Identity: A Healer’s Reflection on Collective Imbalance in India
I am not approaching this as a political analyst, nor as someone interested in ideological battles. I am looking at what is unfolding around us as a healer and social observer, attentive to patterns of consciousness and the ways they quietly shape behaviour, relationships, and everyday life.
In the Indian context, when public narratives repeatedly emphasize threat, grievance, and retaliation, they begin to function less as commentary and more as conditioning. Over time, this conditioning alters how people inhabit their bodies, how they respond emotionally, and how they relate to one another. This shift may not be immediately visible, but its effects are deeply tangible.
Living from the Root: When Fear Becomes Background Noise
In yogic psychology, the root chakra represents safety, grounding, and trust in life. When it is balanced, individuals and societies can engage the world with steadiness. When it is disturbed, fear becomes ambient — always present, rarely questioned.
A constant narrative of being under threat — whether cultural, religious, or civilizational — destabilizes this root. Even as material conditions improve, a subtle sense of insecurity persists. People begin to live with the feeling that something essential is always at risk of being taken away.
From a mind-body perspective, this keeps the nervous system in a mild but continuous state of activation. Reaction becomes quicker than reflection. Complexity feels overwhelming. Survival consciousness slowly replaces curiosity.
A society living from its root chakra alone cannot mature; it can only defend.
Distorted Power: When Agency Turns Reactive
The solar plexus governs agency, confidence, and personal power. In its healthy expression, it supports responsibility, self-respect, and purposeful action. When distorted, power becomes reactive and externally focused.
Rhetoric that repeatedly invokes revenge overstimulates this center without cultivating emotional maturity. Anger is confused with strength. Retaliation is framed as empowerment. The result is not resilience, but heightened reactivity.
From a psychological standpoint, this weakens what we might call the adult self — the capacity to pause, regulate impulses, and choose long-term well-being over immediate emotional discharge. Instead of asking, What is needed here?, the question becomes, Who is to blame?
This shift is subtle, but consequential. A reactive population is easier to mobilize than a reflective one. Over time, responsibility gives way to reflex.
The Heart Under Strain: Selective Empathy
India’s civilizational strength has never been uniformity. It has been the ability to hold difference — often imperfectly, but instinctively. This capacity arises from the heart center, the space of empathy and connection.
When identity is built primarily around grievance, the heart constricts. Compassion becomes conditional. Empathy is extended selectively, reserved for those perceived as “inside,” while others are met with suspicion or indifference.
This contraction does not always announce itself as hatred. More often, it shows up as emotional numbness — a shrinking of concern. Over time, this narrowing of the heart becomes socially acceptable, even justified.
When the heart closes, even spiritual language loses its depth. Symbols meant to point inward become markers of division. Faith becomes defensive. Culture becomes brittle.
Behavioural Signs We Rarely Connect
Energetic and psychological imbalances do not remain confined to ideology. They surface in everyday behaviour.
We see them in increased aggression on the roads, in public intoxication, in casual cruelty online, in the normalization of rage as expression. We see them in shortened attention spans and heightened irritability.
These are not isolated moral failures. They are symptoms of a collective psyche oscillating between fear and anger, without access to grounded adulthood.
When inner safety is compromised, people seek control externally. When inner purpose is unclear, they seek opposition.
This Is Not About Blame
I am not interested in assigning villainy. That would only replicate the same pattern under a different banner.
From a healer’s perspective, what I see is a misalignment of foundational energies:
- A disturbed root creating chronic insecurity
- A distorted solar plexus expressing power as reactivity
- A constricted heart limiting empathy and connection
When these dominate, higher capacities — discernment, creativity, wisdom — struggle to express themselves. Attention remains trapped in emotional survival rather than conscious creation.
This is not a question of ideology. It is a question of inner climate.
The Direction of Healing
Healing does not mean passivity or denial. It means responding from regulation rather than compulsion.
Grounding arises from genuine security — emotional, economic, and relational — not from perpetual agitation. Mature power comes from self-regulation and responsibility, not symbolic victories. The heart reopens when people are allowed to encounter one another as human beings rather than abstractions.
What we need is not louder narratives, but steadier nervous systems.
A society that feels safe within itself does not need to constantly rehearse its wounds. It can acknowledge history without being imprisoned by it.
From Reaction to Maturity
The deeper question before us is not which ideology prevails, but what kind of people we are becoming.
Are we cultivating adults capable of reflection, restraint, and creative engagement? Or are we normalizing a permanent state of emotional adolescence, fueled by fear and reaction?
India’s deeper aspiration has always pointed beyond survival and dominance toward liberation — moksha, in its broadest sense. That aspiration cannot be fulfilled through perpetual reaction. It requires inner steadiness, emotional maturity, and an open heart.
Without these, even success feels hollow.
With them, even disagreement remains humane.
For me, this is not politics. It is the ongoing work of healing — personal, collective, and unfinished.
author’s note
I am writing this as a healer and social observer, not as a political commentator. The reflections here arise from an interest in patterns of consciousness and how they influence individual and collective behaviour over time.
References to yogic psychology and chakras are used as metaphors to understand emotional and psychological dynamics, not as literal or doctrinal claims. This piece is not intended to blame or target any group. Its purpose is to invite reflection on how fear, language, and identity interact within society, and how greater inner balance might support a more humane and mature public life.
Parwatisingari's Weblog 
Leave a comment